Little Progress Over 2000 Years

in by Bryan 13 comments

Why haven't interaction design principles progressed more over the last 2000 years? Is it that intuitive interfaces are deceptively difficult to create? Is there a shortage of knowledge transfer? Does the fact that anyone can *design* an interface help or hurt the transfer of sound design principles?

13 comments

Andres Galarza says

John Maeda wrote,

Some things can never be made simple.

What is there to progress towards, really? The desire for something to be easy to use, yet very powerful, transcends beyond even the 2000 year old artifact (which is a wonder of design) in the video. The guiding principles behind good interaction design have changed little from the time that dudes were wearing loincloths 200,000 years ago. No one likes jumping through unnecessary hoops.

How simple and intuitive is Google? Think about how complex the logic that runs Google’s search is.

With increased access to the web, a shortage of knowledge transfer has become less of a crutch. Lack of access is a problem, even where it was invented, but once connected there’s no shortage of good and bad examples of good interaction design.

The optimist in me thinks that the fact that "anyone" can design a user interface can only help. The unprecedented access to information, particularly if you work in this industry, means that if you don’t adopt sound principles of design, then it’s by choice or ignorance and not from the lack of access to knowledge.

Is this too simplistic of a view to have?


Jeremy (ZURB) says

Calling this a computer is a bit over the top. How is it that a 2000 year old hand-cranked clock is an example of little progress in interaction design today?

I think sometimes we forget how old our amazing technologies really are. Stanford just celebrated the 40th anniversary of the first personal computer. (Our desktops are already middle aged!) Heck, some of our favorite software like Photoshop is almost 30 years old. Technological innovation takes more time than we like to think.

But as my examples show, it is speeding up. Maybe that's your answer: we haven't progressed as much as you'd think because for most of the past 2000 years we've been slow to fail. And after all, isn't this clock another example of a failed product design? If it was a success we wouldn't have to be rediscovering it two millennia later. What other, more successful mechanical devices did it influence? Or was the knowledge that went into it lost? That'd be a true failure.

At least in the 21st century we do this stuff faster.


hedge fund alert says

Well this kind of information is really worth searching for, great information for readers and a value for you as will definitely show teh quality of teh writer. Its great to have these kinds of articles around to keep teh information flow steady. Helping those who really can make things right in teh future, great work! you will put your site on my blogroll. Buh Bye


bottle rocket says

If so, feel free to email me. danke. If you want to exchange links let me know.


nfl undefined says

meself am pleased to communicate with you and welcome and meself want to clarify dha entire ASAP Moses hilarious Anyway, yours truly felt it was about time yours truly posted Bye Bye


commercials tv says

Hi yours truly like your site and wanted to know if you would be interested in exchanging blogroll links. thx in advance


condominiums says

Sounds like a plan to me Very interesting posts and well written. Cu Later


dog electronic flea collar says

Hey refreshing and very informative. i wish there were more blogs like it. Anyway, i felt it was about time i posted, I Would you be interested in exchanging blogrolls links with my site?


printers row lit fest 2010 says

Good stuff, It might just work, although it seems easier when you have a plan. Would you be interested in exchanging blogrolls links with my site? Yours Sincerly


adapters and bindings says

yours truly must say this is a ubercool article yours truly enjoyed reading it keep the good work Bye Bye


Opencart says

Always been fascinated by this device, the Antikythera mechanism, an amazing piece of technology which is much more than a simple clock. I invite to firther investigate about it, you might feel very surprised.

You know, we tend to think people in the past were kind of monkeys whereas a man from 20.000 years ago would have more or less the same intelligence as most of us (most propably more than many out there) nowadays. They achieved remarkably devices such as this one, which shows us how developed their minds were. Now, saying this is a sample of another product design failure sounds so abstracted from the nature of how humans technology develops, that should really be reconsidered. History proves technology does not develop in a linear manner. It may be more linear this days, for sure, but it certainly wasn't 2000 years ago.

This said, I really love to hear your inspiring thoughts. I am big fan of your blog. Keep it up!!!

Cheers