Interactive and Interaction Design, What's the Difference?

in by Bryan 4 comments


Interactive vs. Interaction: People get get confused by terms that are so similar. To define the concepts more clearly, consider whether a designer is affecting the system or influencing how a user clicks around a website.

Interactive Designers Interaction Designers
Interactive designers tend to think of the web as a series of branded moments that occur through a series of frames that a user clicks through. Interaction designers are more concerned about the intent of the user and how they can help them accomplish a task.

Why should you care?



Well, we're not sure you should. Terminology varies in the web world because it's still very young. That's ok for designers. Designers still have to sell themselves anyway— our industry is so fragmented that the collective benefits of a unified industry don't really provide benefits. The terminology someone in our industry chooses is revealing, though, and gives us some insights into where they fall on the interaction vs. interactive design spectrum.

Ultimately what's best for a company depends on several factors. As with the Flash vs. Javascript debate, it's not whether one is good and another is bad, it's how the concept is implemented. Many web sites are interactive, but looking at site designs with a critical eye toward interaction can drastically improve a user's perception of a site as they click through.

4 comments

Gaspas says

isn't the some think?

interactive #1 interaction #2

• #1 "user clicks through" perhaps because he intend to #2 "accomplish a task"

• to #2 "accomplish a task" you go through out a few steps = #1 "series of branded moments"

when i thing in #2 "intent of the user and how they can help" i have to define how the system will react in the better way to the user and how the system will guide the user.

Make any sense separate both, when your purpose is helping users in their desired journey by our site?


KSF KAY says

Though you can say that interactive designers tend to think of everything being a series of branded moments vs interaction designers concern to focus mainly at users intent to accomplish a task. The question is whether or not interactive designers care about whether their users accomplish a task or not, and the answer is that they do and they have been doing so for many years through the psychological processes of advertising which involves sending a clear message about its brand. It's a misbelief that they do not focus on these issues.

Interaction designers are not truly trained to deal with such matters unless they have an advertising design background. So they rely only on a raw collection of data such as numbers, statistics and similar type information that is more general. So interaction designers can only handle general information. However interactive designers have been known to represent a company's brand while also handling general information, but never the other way around.

The truth of the mater is that the two are the same and there are two different groups pushing a different perspective on the same subject matter. In the end, the fusion of the two would be most wanted, but primarily there is a separation, dependent on the type of information being transmitted within a design.


leute in hamburg kennenlernen says

Characteristic Down,practice class game sale impose before volume believe explore use too sale context end weather even property determine form park remain force alright unable control go anyone less stick fish region tour believe introduce change development shoulder mistake anybody conduct fashion few put output often fee order red half climb difficulty hear worker surely hope effect only build increase space quick finance her above debate extra mountain link possible noise here social item equal present trouble either potential express kill song about little training summer demand field