Google Instant: Boss or Bust?

in by Dave 11 comments

Google makes a point of consistently pushing their products in new, and often times bold directions. It can be seen across their suite of apps and sometimes even in the advent of new apps (like the recently buried Google Wave). Google prides itself on pushing what is possible on the web, and with the growing popularity of ajax-powered sites that don't require a refresh, why shouldn't Google be on board?

Google Instant was released in early September of this year. Surely anyone who uses Google regularly noticed that from the homepage, as soon as a character is entered in the search input, the entire page changes. Haven't seen it yet? Go to www.Google.com and just start typing in the search box - you're bound to notice the surprising 200+ pixel jump that coincides with the bubbling of an autocomplete box, as well as a whole page of results, ads and sidebar navigation.

The Google homepage is transformed without warning to the results page, starting with the first character and a few milliseconds delay.

Initial feedback on the feature was polarized - it seemed that some loved the perception of faster results and the ability to see what was being populated, while others we're upset by the confusing transition and distracting updated results that flash every time a new character is entered.

What We Think

We appreciate that Google is always pushing the envelope and releasing new features, but we question whether the design decisions are always fully considered. Using Google Instant for the first time is jarring.

  • When you start to type the entire page flashes (except for the search box which still moves quite some distance) and you find yourself on the results page, but with ultimately useless results since a single character is unlikely to surface quality results. Joining the results are ads, an autocomplete box and the new Google sidebar navigation. It's a lot to take in for one keystroke.
  • Then with each successive character typed the majority of the page flashes bringing in updated results and new autocomplete suggestions. The problem is that each new character means a user has two sections competing for attention - updated autocomplete suggestions and a whole page of results.

Luckily, Google has been taking the approach of user choice. With their release of newer features, Google typically allows users to disable the updates. In the case of Google Instant, the option to turn it off shows up to the immediate right of the search box after you enter the first character in a search. We love that Google tries new things - it's what keeps them on top and moving forward, but what do you think? Is Google Instant a winner or are you distracted by the constantly changing page?

We can ask some of these questions this Friday (Dec. 17) when Irene Au, Head of User Experience at Google, comes in for ZURBsoapbox.

11 comments

Brent Daugherty says

I think Google Instant is good after the page format changes (after you type the first letter) from the homepage to the search results page. But I don't like the page format switch itself from the simple homepage to the search results page. It's too much changing in the background; It becomes distracting. I think they need to remove Google Instant from the homepage (and just do auto-suggest) or the homepage needs to start in the same design as the search results page.


Dave (ZURB) says

@Brent - We generally agree concerning the abrupt swap of layout. The transition between the homepage and the results page with Instant is even more drastic if the user has a dark background image set for their homepage.


mirek says

My only thing to it is that people might get confused what's going on and I see no explaining button where I can read why is the page acting like that, on the other hand live search gives me lot of times better results during the typing than when i finish typing


Elliott Bowles says

I like the Google Instant feature mainly because it saves a return keystroke to display results. While this spilt second time saving is relatively insignificant, it provides the illusion of greatly increased speed. Google also combined the instant feature with new keyboard navigation of results, something that I really like because I don't need to click at all during the search process. I'm glad google made this an opt-outable feature, because it isn't for everyone. I like it however.


Peter Gassner says

I was quite glad when I found the setting to turn it off. What seemed like a great idea at first, quickly turned into making search more difficult for me. Why? Because I'm constantly refining the query with new ideas while reading through the results, which won't work with auto-refreshing results. This is something I hadn't even noticed I was doing before the arrival of Instant…


Dave (ZURB) says

@Peter Gassner - I am the exact same way. Google's autocomplete suggestions have trained me to start my query character by character and wait for a suggestion that makes sense. I do it because I know if it's an autosuggestion it will likely lead to quality results.


Warhead eCommerce says

Just adding my $.02 here. Instant is a really cool idea. I think for all the new technology that's used, and being such a big change in usability, overall things are pretty smooth and seem to work well. That said, there have been a couple of annoyances I've noticed while using it.

1) The dreaded 'Press Enter to Search' message. What makes it worse is when I've scrolled down the page & results disappear leaving a blank page for me to scroll back up and press enter at the top to refresh. It seems to happen when I'm clicking around fast or press buttons a little early, not sure on that though.

2) The back button functionality in another thing. I don't care for how it sometimes takes you to original query instead of the last search you've performed in a series of queries or refinements to a single query. It happens sometimes when clicking back from a clicked through result as well.

3) The last thing isn't really a bug, but it does bother me. I was disappointed that there is no search box at the bottom of results in Instant. I understand how it won't work properly, but you'd think there would be a way to make it work - it is Google we're talking about!

Thanks for letting me share. Hope this helps improve Instant. FYI, I tend to use the latest version of Firefox and/or Chrome as my browser(s) of choice.


Russ says

I find Google Instant very distracting as the background constantly changes with every keystroke. And I find that I need to type much slower as the refreshing messes up my typing. Nice idea, but bad for execution...

I almost think that results should not change with every keystroke, but after every word. The experience would be much smoother.


Dave (ZURB) says

@Warhead eCommerce - We're of similar opinions. We really appreciate that Google is trying to move forward and embrace new technical possibilities, but we also challenge if all of the interactions have been thought through. Since the search is initiated without clicking, why can't I have endless scrolling results? Google already does this on their image search and it works fantastically.

@Russ - There are definitely some minute tweaks for Instant to really create a "wow" moment and resolving the issue of distracting results populating every keystroke is one of them.


Liza says

I can't believe it myself but I have noticed Google Instant presence only after listening to your podcast with Irene!

Google Instant is extremely natural to me, I like to surf Internet, to look for different things and Instant sometimes proposes "wow" results to my yet uncompleted questions. You know, it's really creative.